Thursday, September 25, 2008

The Misadventures of Senator John McSame: Economics & Judgment Gone Wrong!!!

From NYTimes:
"On Monday morning, as the financial system absorbed one of its biggest shocks in generations, Senator John McCain said, as he had many times before, that he believed the fundamentals of the economy were “strong.”
Hours later he backpedaled, explaining that he had meant that American workers, whom he described as the backbone of the economy, were productive and resilient. By Tuesday he was calling the economic situation “a total crisis” and denouncing “greed” on Wall Street and in Washington.
The sharp turnabout in tone and substance reflected a recognition not only that Mr. McCain had struck a discordant note at a sensitive moment but also that he had done so with regard to the very issue on which he can least afford to stumble.
With economic conditions worsening over the course of this year and voter anxiety on the rise, Mr. McCain has had to labor to get past the impression — fostered by his own admissions as recently as last year that the subject is not his strongest suit — that he lacks the experience and understanding to address the nation’s economic woes.
In the most recent case, he first sought to explain away his remarks about the economy’s fundamental soundness by saying he had been referring to the American people, almost daring his Democratic rival, Senator Barack Obama, to contradict him on that score. But within hours his aides were scheduling appearances for him Tuesday on all the morning television news shows so that he could try to erase the notion, being promoted aggressively by Democrats, that he was out of touch. "

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Charles Rangel: Clock Ticking Til Checkout Time

From the NYTimes:
"Mounting embarrassment for taxpayers and Congress makes it imperative that Representative Charles Rangel step aside as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee while his ethical problems are investigated.

This recommendation does not come easily, considering the New York Democrat’s four decades of service in Congress. But Mr. Rangel himself has felt obliged to request three separate House ethics inquiries of his behavior. While denying serious improprieties, Mr. Rangel concedes that he has not lived up to the “higher standard” expected of members of Congress.

His latest admission is that as chief of Congress’s tax-writing committee, he was “irresponsible” in failing to disclose $75,000 in rental income and pay federal and state taxes on a villa in the Dominican Republic.

His temporary yielding of the gavel is an urgent necessity for a Democratic Congress elected two years ago on promises of an ethical housecleaning. The villa dealings only add momentum to the investigations of two earlier controversies — Mr. Rangel’s favored treatment in occupying four rent-stabilized apartments in Manhattan, and his improper use of official letterheads to solicit support from charities and corporations for an academic center to memorialize his career in public service..." Read more...

White Collar Crimes: Assembly Seat For Sale!

From The New York Times:

"According to federal prosecutors, Mr. Seminerio realized that he had done favors for people in the health care and hospital industry, and that those people sometimes made thousands of dollars from those favors.

So he decided to start charging for his services, prosecutors say, even though they were part of his job as a legislator..." Read more...

White Collar Crimes: Albert Jack Stanley and Haliburton!!!


From The Huffington Post:

"The Justice Department said Albert "Jack" Stanley entered a guilty plea Wednesday in federal court in Houston to conspiring in a decade-long scheme to bribe Nigerian government officials in return for engineering and construction contracts...." Read more...

The Misadventures of Senator John McSame: 'Meet John Bush'

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Palin the Reformer? Not So Fast!

From The Observer:

Is Sarah Palin the implacable pit bull of government reform, lipstick and all? The latest Republican campaign commercial pictures her in heroic terms at the side of John McCain as one of the “original mavericks,” declaring that she “stopped the bridge to nowhere.”

The fate of that canceled span—which would have used nearly $400 million in federal funds to connect the tiny Alaskan island of Gravina to the mainland town of Ketchikan and the rest of the state—is meant to symbolize her aggressive opposition to wasteful spending.

But even cursory examination shows that her posturing is wildly exaggerated and her campaign claims veer toward fraud. Details are important in these matters, especially when the lobbyists and consultants surrounding Senator McCain are so intent on blurring the truth.

The true story of the Ketchikan bridge begins, like most fables of Alaskan government run amok, in the offices of Senator Ted Stevens and Representative Don Young, the formerly powerful, ethically dubious Republican duo brought low by investigation and indictment. Although her gubernatorial campaign Web site once featured endorsements from both men, Governor Palin has long since dumped them as inconvenient baggage. But her appetite for the federal dollars they brought back to her state was no less voracious than theirs—until the state’s reputation for budgetary gluttony became embarrassing to her.

As Congressional Quarterly points out, in its impeccably nonpartisan style, Ms. Palin continued to campaign enthusiastically for the “bridge to nowhere” long after Mr. McCain and others first exposed the project three years ago. Indeed, she literally campaigned for the Ketchikan project while running for governor in 2006, evidently because she believed that her support would draw votes in southeastern Alaska. By then Congress had already repealed any requirement that the state spend any money on the project, but she didn’t care.
[Photo Credit: The Observer]

Charlie's Caribbean Villa in D.R.

From the Gothamist:

Ever since the NY Times reported that Representative Charles Rangel had four rent-stabilized apartments--three for living quarters and one for an office--his real-estate holdings have been scrutinized. Now the NY Post puts a dozing Rangel on its cover for a story about his vacation property in the Dominican Republic.

Rangel owns a beachfront villa that is apparently rented out to resort goers at the Punta Cana Hotel, but the Post says he "has only sporadically declared income on the property in federal filings." The three-bedroom, three-bath villa "is rented for between $500 in the low season to $1,100 a night in the busiest tourist season." The hotel's staff says that Rangel's villa had been available in 2006 and 2007 (the hotel is "always booked solid" on Rangel's villa), but Rangel claimed, "I have not received any rental income. There wasn't any rental income."

Rangel did report rental income on the villa between 2001 and 2005. One possible explanation is that rental income was put back into the resort (for repairs or other maintenance), but a watchdog group tells the Post that reinvesting rental income "would have to be disclosed." [Photo Credit: NYPost]

The Misadventures of Senator John McSame: Deconstructing Cindy-rella McCain

From Just Another Blog from L.A. :

From the very front page of the newspaper that only the finest families in Southern California use to line their cat pans & bird cages comes the tale of Cinderella Stepford Hensley McCain, the beer heiress whose family business may cause some conflict if (Fat chance!) her hubby John were to win the presidency.

A close look at Hensley shows that the company has opposed changes that critics of the beer industry say were intended to help Americans drink responsibly.

[...]McCain has avoided problems in the Senate by recusing himself on alcohol issues, according to executives at the Distilled Spirits Council, the liquor industry's trade association."Sen. McCain has been very, very fair to this industry," said Frank Coleman, senior vice president for the council. "He stays an arm's length away from issues that benefit the family business."

Already causing problems, if he has to recuse himself from law-making. And may cause problems w/ the "clinging to guns & gawd" base, as well.

For some, abstinence -- and a disdain for the industry -- is religion-based. Leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention, which has more than 16 million members, expressed "total opposition to the manufacturing, advertising, distributing and consuming of alcoholic beverages" in the church's most recent resolution on the matter."

I am sure for some individual Southern Baptists, [the McCain family's involvement in the beer business] would be a concern," said Roger S. Oldham, vice president of Southern Baptist Convention relations.

The Misadventures of Senator John McSame: Do As I Say, Not As I Do!

Curiously enough the same man convicted on several civil racketeering charges, Charles H. Keating Jr., began a foundation against child abuse...


Citizens for Decency through Law (CDL), one of the first major anti-pornography organizations in the United States, was founded in 1956 by lawyer and future financier Charles H. Keating Jr., after his daughter was sexually attacked in the 1950s. Believing that PORNOGRAPHY causes violence and CHILD ABUSE, CDL members have endeavored to stop the sale of pornographic material and close movie theaters that show sexually explicit movies by pressuring politicians and judges into enforcing OBSCENITY laws.

CDL has provided legal advice to cities investigating dealers in sexually explicit motion pictures, magazines, and mail-order publications. CDL attorneys have concentrated on helping the police and prosecutors to prepare trials and appeals in obscenity cases, prepare testimony before local, state, and federal legislative committees, and draft model legislation. Between 1963 and 1981, CDL sponsored or wrote AMICUS CURIAE (FRIEND-OF-THE-COURT) briefs for 27 obscenity cases reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Of those cases, 37 percent had rulings favorable to CDL's views...



Excerpts from The Ethics Commission on 'Keating'

From the NYTIMES:

Following are excerpts from a transcript of today's session of the Senate Ethics Committee's hearings into the conduct of five Senators in the Lincoln Savings and Loan affair. The Federal News Service, a transcription company, recorded the session.

ROBERT S. BENNETT, special counsel to the committee: This is the final portion of the evidentiary presentation, and it deals with Senator Cranston. The evidence will show that on approximately four separate occasions Senator Cranston accepted or solicited several hundred thousand dollars from Mr. Keating for Senator Cranston's voter registration groups and that each of these four occasions was linked by time and circumstance to a request by Mr. Keating for assistance with the bank board. . . .

Mr. Keating, the evidence will show, or members of his family or individuals employed by him, gave about $49,000 to the Senator's -- Cranston's -- campaigns. . . . It appears that all of these contributions were duly reported to the Federal Election Commission. Lincoln also made, in addition to those contributions, a $300,000 line of credit available to Senator Cranston's campaign under unusual circumstances. . . .

Most significantly, Mr. Keating's companies contributed a total of $850,000 to groups closely affiliated with the Senator. These contributions were not required by law to be publicly disclosed, and Mr. Keating had asked that he be listed as an anonymous contributor. These groups were U.S.A. Votes, the Center for Participation in Democracy and the Forum Institute. They were funded, and what they did is they funded or conducted voter registration drives. The Senator's son, Kim Cranston, was a full-time unsalaried officer and director of two groups that benefited directly and indirectly from these contributions. . . .

Read more...

The Keating Court Files

From the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals:

In 1990, Keating was indicted in California state court forviolating sections 25401 and 25540 of the California Corpora-tions Code, which make it a criminal offense to offer or sella security "by means of any written or oral communicationwhich includes an untrue statement of material fact necessaryin order to make the statements made, in light of the circum-stances under which they were made, not misleading. " Thestate contended, in essence, that the bond sellers were misledby Keating's failure to inform them of American Continen-tal's poor financial condition and the riskiness of the bonds,and that they, in turn, unwittingly misled the bond purchasers.It is undisputed that in 1989, when American Continental'sfinancial circumstances had deteriorated to the point wherethe company was no longer able to make payments on thebonds, it filed for bankruptcy and most of the bond purchaserslost the money they had invested.

2 Prior to trial, the judge informed the jury that Keating could be held criminally responsible either as a direct perpetrator orfor aiding and abetting the offense. Before the parties' closingarguments, however, a dispute erupted over whether a directperpetrator theory of liability would be presented to the jury.The defense requested a jury instruction that, because Keatinghad not personally sold or offered the securities to the pur-chasers, he could only be convicted as an aider and abettor.The prosecution objected, informing the court that it plannedto argue both theories to the jury. Keating renewed his protest,pointing out that he had had no face-to-face contact or directcommunication with the individuals named in the indictment,and the trial judge concurred with his skepticism about thedirect perpetrator theory. The prosecutor countered that adirect perpetrator instruction was "supported in an evidentiarysense" if Keating was viewed as the original source of theoffer and of the misleading omission of information. Theprosecution characterized Keating "as the alter ego for thecorporation" and stated that in its view "the gravaman of theoffense . . . is not so much an actual sale as it is the omissionor misrepresentation aspect of it." This theory identified Keat-ing as the source of the failure to notify anyone of the finan-cial risks of the bonds, a material omission that was ultimatelytransmitted to the bond purchasers, and that was "violative ofthe statute just as much as an actual sale." As the judge's dis-comfort with the prosecution's theory of liability becameincreasingly clear, the prosecution urged one last possibleway to view Keating as a direct perpetrator...

Read more...

The Misadventures of John McSame:"The Judgement To Be What?"

Why is no one bringing up the Keating Five Issue?
Ben Smith From Politico writes:
Carrie Budoff Brown reports that Sen. Barack Obama's campaign distanced itself tonight from some harsh remarks from Congressman Peter DeFazio about Sen. John McCain at a town hall meeting in Albany, Ore. DeFazio, an Oregon superdelegate who endorsed Obama today and introduced him at the event, went on an extended critique of McCain, saying voters could not "underestimate the threat that John McCain poses in this election to our future." DeFazio said McCain's Straight Talk Express should be called the "Trojan horse express." And then, DeFazio raised the Keating Five, a 1980s savings and loan scandal in which McCain was implicated. The Senate Ethics Committee later concluded that McCain used "poor judgment" in the matter. "John McCain has already told us he doesn’t know much about economics," DeFazio told the crowd of 3,000. "He says we need less regulation. Hello? Wall Street, mortgage meltdown, Bear Stearns, taxpayer bailout, Enron. But I guess maybe for a guy who was up to his neck in the Keating Five, and savings and loan scandal, less regulation is better for his friends. No, that is not good for the American people."